↓ Skip to main content

·87 words

LLMs are fundamentally matching the patterns they’ve seen, and their abilities are constrained by mathematical boundaries. Embedding tricks and chain-of-thought prompting simply extends their ability to do more sophisticated pattern matching. The mathematical results imply that you can always find compositional tasks whose complexity lies beyond a given system’s abilities.

LLMs are still very useful in a bunch of domains but here’s an article explaining (from a paper with a novel bound on computational complexity) why improvements in reasoning seem to have run out of steam.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/chatbot-software-begins-to-face-fundamental-limitations-20250131/

Alper Cugun
Author
Alper Cugun

Related

The Agents chapter from Chip Huyen’s book “AI Engineering” is clear and enjoyable to read. She’s right that “the concept of an agent is fairly simple” but building something functional still looks like a massive lift.